SELECTION OF 3D PRINTING METHOD: A MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS APPROACH FOR COMPLEX HEALTHCARE CASES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.16891/2317-434X.v13.e4.a2026.id2980Keywords:
Additive Manufacturing, Multicriteria Decision, HealthcareAbstract
Additive Manufacturing, as an integral part of Industry 4.0, has gained prominence in the medical-hospital sector, particularly in the production of customized anatomical models. Precision and quality in 3D printing depend on accurate parameter configurations, making the proper selection of the printing method essential. Multicriteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) plays a crucial role in enabling a thorough evaluation of alternatives to optimize efficiency, quality, costs, and development time, meeting the rigorous standards required in the medical field. This study applied the PROMETHEE II method to determine 3D printing parameters for a human aorta anatomical model. Criteria such as cost, time, and layer height were assessed across 15 printing models using three types of 3D printers and materials: Polylactic Acid (PLA), Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS), and liquid resin curable by ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Resin parts stood out, achieving the highest rankings, particularly in the X-axis orientation. The results provide technical and strategic support for researchers and healthcare professionals, enabling the use of additive manufacturing technologies in complex applications. The integration of MCDA and 3D printing fosters innovative practices, promoting safety and efficiency while contributing to improved patient outcomes.